|
Have
you ever sat down and thought about the numbers if 2 to 3 million
people left Egypt? The Israelites were down in Egypt about 140
years. Could those people become 2-3 million in 140 years? Let’s
do some math here. The three million is based on an estimate that
600,000 men would have wives (about 1.2 million) and they would
have about 2 children each (2.4 million). It has been estimated
there were only about 3-4 million people in Egypt total at this
time. This would have meant that Israel would have comprised 75%
of the population. So let’s see here; for that to happen in four
generations, each couple would have to have about 32 children
(70 x 32 x 32 x 32 =2.3 million). What a woman! Now if this is
correct, assuming 1,000 square feet for a family (small for 34
people), three million people would cover an area of 21 square
miles. Now the manna did not get supplied to them until they had
been out in the desert 45 days, or for a month and a half. We’re
talking 600,000 families here. If each of these families of approximately
34, had a lamb a day to eat, they would need about 2 million of
them. The sheep production of the United States is only 12.5 million
“a year.”
Also
they would have needed three
million gallons of water
a day. Then if there were
600,000 men who were ready
for battle, why would they
be afraid of Pharaoh’s measly
600 chariots? What it appears
may have happened here according
to Rabbi Calpino, is the
Hebrew letter “alef” is
often translated as “thousand.”
However, it can also mean
“families.” If this was
the case, then we would
have “6 hundred families”,
not 6 hundred “thousand.”
This would mean each family
would have had approximately
3-5 children (70 x5x5x5=8,750),
plus the mixed multitude
would have made it about
9,000 people. In that case,
with only 600 Israelite
warriors, 600 chariots would
have meant getting wiped
out for Israel. If each
family consisted of 2 or
3 generations, then each
family would be approximately
14-15 people. Now, am I
saying God is incapable
of doing it the way we’ve
always heard, no. In the
same vane, could there be
another answer to these
questions by a mistranslation
of a letter, possibly.
|